Subscribe for 12 months with recurring billing - $199

Buy 12 months of subscription time - $199


Search Uranium Stocks
Uranium Price
Our RSS Feed

Uranium Updates

Enter your email address:

Follow Us on Twitter
« Coal and Shale Gas: America's Energy Siblings Are Locked in Rivalry | Main | First Uranium slams Olma's proposal as 'unrealistic' with 'zero chance' of success »

No obvious solution to plug base-load gap should nuclear not proceed – Godsell

In the absence of the 9 600 MW of nuclear energy capacity outlined for introduction into South Africa’s power generation mix between 2023 and 2030, it was unclear how the country could meet its "ambitious" electricity expansion plan, a leading business personality said on Tuesday

Speaking at a nuclear conference in Johannesburg on Tuesday Bobby Godsell stressed it was not a case of either nuclear, renewable energy, or any other power generation source to add the 42 600 MW of new capacity that was likely to be required to meet demand by 2030. Rather, the Business Leadership South Africa chairperson, who was also previously a chairperson of power utility Eskom, argued that it was a case of expanding and replacing the existing coal-heavy system in a way that ensured that it became an engine for economic growth and social progress.

The plan to add more than 17 000 MW of renewable-energy capacity was already "ambitious" and "I can't see any other gap filler", particularly for the addition of base-load capacity.

But it was necessary to transition away from the current mix that was concentrated in the northeast of the country and on one primary energy source, which placed a burden on the transmission system, the environment and the country’s coal resources.

There is nothing uniquely bad about nuclear power and nothing uniquely good about other sources of electricity,” he noted.

However, funding the expansion envisaged in the current version of the Integrated Resource Plan, or IRP2010, including the nuclear programme, would require greater price-path certainty, as the user-pays principle was the best way of paying for electricity capacity.

There could, however, be social and economic instances that were supportive of subsidisation, but these should be made transparent.

The price trajectory, Godsell averred, should also ensure visibility on how the operational and maintenance costs would be recovered, as well as provide the basis for the expansion of the system.

Godsell suggested that price-path certainty should extend beyond the current three-year rotation to offer certainty for power developers, as well as for those investors that required such visibility to support their investment plans.

It was anticipated that the third multiyear price determination period, which would begin in 2013, could be extended to five or even seven years. Eskom was expected to make its application to the National Energy Regulator of South Africa by mid-year.

According to a report in Engineering News online.

Regarding Our annual performance figures are as follows:

2009 We made a profit of 23.89%

2010 We made a profit of 158.66%

2011 We made a profit of 40.95%

In 2011 we outperformed:

S&P by 42%

HUI by 53%

Gold by 31%

Silver by 41%

Our trading success rate is 90.81%

89 profitable trades out of 98.

Our model portfolio is up 447.55% since inception

Also many thanks to those of you who have already joined us and for the very kind words that you sent us regarding the service so far, we hope that we can continue to put a smile on your faces.

To stay updated on our market commentary, which gold stocks we are buying and why, please subscribe to The Gold Prices Newsletter, completely FREE of charge. Simply click here and enter your email address. Winners of the GoldDrivers Stock Picking Competition 2007  

For those readers who are also interested in the silver bull market that is currently unfolding, you may want to subscribe to our  Free Silver Prices Newsletter.

For those readers who are also interested in the nuclear power sector you may want to subscribe to our Free Uranium Stocks Newsletter, just click here. 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>