Subscribe for 12 months with recurring billing - $199

Buy 12 months of subscription time - $199


Search Uranium Stocks
Uranium Price
Our RSS Feed

Uranium Updates

Enter your email address:

Follow Us on Twitter

Cameco PUTS wait for it

Today we thought we would be buying some PUTS on Cameco Corporation (CCJ) however the market took off with the DOW adding 214 points or 2.61% on optimism for the banks. Our tiny sector took off too, with Denison Mines, for example adding $0.47 or 23.62%. In turn Cameco also gained adding $0.75 or 3.07% by the close in New York.

We are still of the opinion that it is good for a short however timing the entry into such a position is critical to the success of the trade. If we look at the JUN-09 $25.00 PUT (CCJRE) as it was one of the most actively traded we can see that it closed slightly lower at a $1.95 when compared with the previous days close of $1.99. If this stock continues to gain then the likely hood of a correction becomes more of a possibility and the cost of buying the PUTS becomes cheaper. For now we will watch the action closely and try and determine a suitable entry point.

Have a good one.

If you are new to this web site and wish to receive our free newsletter regarding investment in uranium stocks and updates regarding uranium, then please click here to subscribe.

These are fast changing times and its essential that you stay up to date with what is going on in the market. For our latest commentary and trading signals on gold, click here to subscribe to The FREE Gold Prices Newsletter and click here for The FREE Silver Prices Newsletter.


Cameco Corporation looks ripe for a short

Cameco Chart 02 May 09.JPG

Chart courtesy of TradeTech.

Taking a quick look at the above chart we can see that Cameco Corporation (CCJ) has put in a terrific run recently as the uranium sector attracts a little more in the way of investor interest.

The technical indicators suggest that this stock is now overbought especially the RSI which stands at 82.23 and it appears to us to be ready to take a breather and retrace a few steps back towards the $20.00 level.

In anticipation of a pull back we are looking at purchasing the June 2009 PUTS at a strike price possibly just out of the money. We will watch the market opening on Monday and then take it from there. This is a hit and run trade so we don't expect to hold this position for very long. If and when a reasonable profit appears we will close the trade.

We thought that it might help if we gave you a 'heads up' as to the way we are thinking and how we intend to try and make a few bucks from this situation. Your comments are of course most welcome.

Cameco Corporation has a market capitalization of $9.60 billion, a 52 week high of C$44.00 and a 52 week low of C$11.78, average turnover is was 2.77 million shares and trades as CCO on the Toronto Stock Exchange and as CCJ on the New York Stock Exchange.

Have a good one.

If you are new to this web site and wish to receive our free newsletter regarding investment in uranium stocks and updates regarding uranium, then please click here to subscribe.

These are fast changing times and its essential that you stay up to date with what is going on in the market. For our latest commentary and trading signals on gold, click here to subscribe to The FREE Gold Prices Newsletter and click here for The FREE Silver Prices Newsletter.

Uranium Stocks Attracting More Interest

Uranium Chart 30 apr 09.JPG

Chart courtesy of

What a day today has been for uranium stocks as some put on tremendous gains, such as Uranium Resources Incorporated (URRE) up 50%, Crosshair Exploration and Mining Corporation (CXX) up 41.67%, Denison Mines Corporation (DNN) up 22% and Laramide up 11.11% to mention just a few.

Also take a note of the increased volume of shares now being traded on these stocks, URRE has an average daily turnover of 393,000 and yesterday that number hit 4.56 million, so investor interest is returning with a vengeance.

Picking entry points is always difficult but it does appear to us that this tiny sector is trying to get up off the floor having been slaughtered during the recent broader market sell off attributed to de-leveraging. The rally in the main markets may continue a little longer however we think it is nothing more than a bear rally and an opportunity to get out of mainstream stocks at slightly higher prices. The banking sector remains treacherous as the latest fad of stress testing is implemented with the results eagerly awaited. When this rally peters out and stocks once again head south it may well take uraniums with it. The month of May is upon us so we will see just how resilient this sector is. The spot price of uranium has moved up slightly and would appear to be the indicator that is being closely watched and acted upon. The longer term price for uranium remains steady at $70/lb which is the 'good news' in our humble opinion.

Uranium Long term price from TradeTech 30 Apr 09.JPG
Chart courtesy of TradeTech.

Have a good one.

If you are new to this web site and wish to receive our free newsletter regarding investment in uranium stocks and updates regarding uranium, then please click here to subscribe.

These are fast changing times and its essential that you stay up to date with what is going on in the market. For our latest commentary and trading signals on gold, click here to subscribe to The FREE Gold Prices Newsletter and click here for The FREE Silver Prices Newsletter.


Laramide Resources Limited Up 32.77% Today

LAM Chart 28 apr 09.JPG

Chart courtesy of

On the 23rd April 2009 Laramide updated their NI 43-101 with the following news release:

Laramide Resources Ltd. is pleased to results of an updated NI 43-101 compliant Technical Report (“Technical Report”) completed by Mining Associates of Australia (“Mining Associates”) on its Westmoreland uranium property located in North West Queensland, Australia. The results are as follows, with the Technical Report to be SEDAR-filed within the next thirty days.

The primary focus of the 2008 drilling program was to upgrade existing Inferred uranium resources to Indicated resources. This objective was achieved, as Mining Associates has reported an Indicated mineral resource totaling 36.0 million pounds of uranium (U3O8) contained in 18.7 million tonnes at an average grade of 0.089% U3O8, and an additional Inferred mineral resource totaling 15.9 million pounds of uranium (U3O8) contained in 9.0 million tonnes at an average grade of 0.083 % U3O8 on the property. All of the mineralization occurs in flat and steep lying zones within 100 metres depth, with 60 % of the mineralization occurring above 30 metres depth. The flat lying mineralization is between 5 and 30 metres thick and lies between 5 and 30 metres below the surface. Pitchblende is the main uranium mineralization and occurs within both the Westmoreland conglomerate and within altered steep dykes which acted as a reductant to precipitate the mineralization.

Click here to read the report in full. At the time of this report being issued the stock price was $1.52 and has increased steadily until today when it took off.

As we can see from the above chart Laramide has jumped forward on steadily increasing volume. The RSI is now above '70' which suggests that LAM is overbought so we could see a slight pull back.

Other Uraniums performing today include:

Strathmore Minerals Corp.
(Public, CVE:STM) Up 38.30%

Uranerz Energy Corp.
(Public, AMEX:URZ) Up 33.96%

Bayswater Uranium Corp.
(Public, CVE:BAY) Up 33.33%

Ur-Energy Inc.
(Public, TSE:URE) Up 14%

Laramide Resources Limited has a market capitalization of $159 million, with 62.55 million shares outstanding, Laramide closed yesterday at $2.35.

Laramide trades on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol of LAM.

If you are new to this web site and wish to receive our free newsletter regarding investment in uranium stocks and updates regarding uranium, then please click here to subscribe.

These are fast changing times and its essential that you stay up to date with what is going on in the market. For our latest commentary and trading signals on gold, click here to subscribe to The FREE Gold Prices Newsletter and click here for The FREE Silver Prices Newsletter.


Extract Resources Limited: An exciting Prospect!

EXT Chart 21 apr 09.JPG

Chart courtesy of

Extract Resources Limited (EXT) was brought to our attention by one of our readers through the comments section on a recent article, so we have placed it on the Watch List for now. The major shareholder is Kalahari Uranium Limited who can be found on the AIM section of the London Stock Exchange under the symbol of (KAH).

As we can see from the above chart EXT has made incredible progress this year with the stock doubling and doubling again. However it is now taking a well earned breather as some investors take profits off the table.

EXT Map 21 apr 09.JPG

Extract Resources is an Australian company with offices in South Perth, Western Australia and Windhoek and Swakopmund in Namibia, through its subsidiary company, Swakop Uranium. Extract Resources is an Australian-based uranium exploration company whose primary focus is in the African nation of Namibia. The Company’s principal asset is its 100% owned Husab Uranium Project which contains two known uranium deposit areas: Rossing South; and Ida Dome. Extensive exploration potential also exists for new uranium discoveries, in addition to the already known occurrences, Ida Dome having a resource of 25mlbs of U3O8.

Namibia Flag

The management team looks solid and has many years of experience in the mining industry to its credit along with experience gained in Namibia which is an absolute must. The CV for the Managing Director, Peter McIntyre, reads as follows:

Mr McIntyre holds a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering and is a Fellow of the Institution of Engineers, Australia. He has been involved in the mining industry for 30 years which included 15 years with WMC Ltd in various senior management positions and has been involved with the development of major projects. Mr McIntyre is a director of Atticus Resources (ASX:ACZ) and is also a director of Carbon Energy (ASX:CNX). He completed an MBA program at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Boston.

The remainder of the board are similarly qualified.

We have made in vestments in the past in Namibia and on the 15th May 2007 we recommend buying UraMin Incorporated and at that time this what we wrote about Namibia in terms of the political risk there.

As far as geopolitics are concerned, we are comfortable with Namibia as a country on the whole. There is a lot of mining in Namibia and it is the fourth largest exporter of non-fuel minerals in Africa. Mining accounts for 20% of Namibia’s GDP and it is the worlds fifth largest producer of uranium so another uranium mine going into production should go smoothly but we will be keeping a close watch for any developments.

Taking another look at the situation in Namibia we are reasonably relaxed about it and have no real fears about investing there. However you can keep an eye on what goes on there via the New Era, a newspaper for Namibia by clicking this link.

Extract Resources Limited trades under the symbol of EXT on both the Australian Stock Exchange and the Toronto Stock Exchange. The headquarters are in Perth, Western Australia.

According to Google Finance the Market Capitalization is A$1.22 billion, with a 52 week high of $5.42, a 52 week low A$0.75 and closed yesterday at A$3.85. The major shareholder is Kalahari Uranium Ltd (AIM:KAH) - the top 20 shareholders hold 80% of the 223m shares on issue. Also note that Polo Resources Limited have recently increased their holding in the company to approximately 10.1% of Extract's fully paid ordinary shares.

For disclosure purposes we do not own this stock, however, we are watching it.

Got a comment – then fire it in!

Have a good one.

If you are new to this web site and wish to receive our free newsletter regarding investment in uranium stocks and updates regarding uranium, then please click here to subscribe.

For our latest commentary and trading signals on gold and silver, click here to subscribe to The FREE Gold Prices Newsletter and click here for The FREE Silver Prices Newsletter.

Just a thought:

EXT has a resource of 25 million pounds valued at A$2.5 billion assuming uranium sells at A$100/lb which is the long term price on Tradetech of US$70.00/lb. The market capitalization for Extract is AUD$1.18B at the moment which leaves about A$1.0 billion for mining costs, transportation, etc. At the time of writing we do not what these costs are but hopefully one of our knowledgeable readers will dig up something for us. Excuse the pun. Even without these costs we can see that if the stock price doubles so does the market capitalization which means that we would be buying the future potential of more discoveries as the current discovery would be built into the price. Just a thought.


Denison Mines Corporation: Moving Up!

Denison Chart 15 apr 09.JPG

Another good day as Denison Mines Corporation (DNN) gained 17.92% by adding $0.19 to close at $1.25. Also of note is that this uranium stock has almost doubled since trading at $0.70 a couple of weeks ago.

Over the last two weeks Denison has managed to reverse its recent downtrend with a good mini rally. Note the golden crossover on the MACD, which is usually a positive indicator for a stock to make progress. The RSI is getting close to 70 which suggests that the stock is now overbought, but do remember that these indicators are only indicative of movement, its not cast in stone that the stock will behave accordingly.

Denison is a volatile stock in a volatile sector of the market. However, as we have said in the past, individual uranium stocks are making sudden moves upwards as investors slowly return despite the spot price drifting lower. On the AMEX yesterday 2.17 million shares changed hands in this stock, twice the normal average. Over on the Toronto Stock Exchange the volume was a huge 8.4 million shares traded.

Having purchased Denison recently only to see it fall out of bed we are pleased to see it making progress. A breather maybe on the cards in the short term but in a year from now we expect this stock to be trading much higher.

Denison Mines Corporation trades on the AMEX under the symbol of DNN and on the Toronto Stock Exchange as DML.

Market capitalization is $246.62 million, average volume is 708,000 shares traded, 52 week high $9.20, 52 week low $0.54, closed yesterday at $1.25.

Got a comment – then fire it in!

Have a good one.

If you are new to this web site and wish to receive our free newsletter regarding investment in uranium stocks and updates regarding uranium, then please click here to subscribe.

For our latest commentary and trading signals on gold and silver, click here to subscribe to The FREE Gold Prices Newsletter and click here for The FREE Silver Prices Newsletter.


Uranium-Stocks Tops 5000 Subscribers

uranium symbol
A huge thank you from all the team here to the 5000 subscribers who have now enrolled for our free newsletter. This newsletter is now being read in all corners of the globe from Coolangatta to Rio Verde and from Mumbai to Oakland. We are flattered not only by the volume of retail investors but also by the number of stock brokers, fund managers, financial institutions, mining companies, CEOs, VPs, financial letter writers and bankers who are also recipients.

You may have noticed the counter on the home page which says 5003 readers by Feedburner, which is slightly misleading as it refers to subscribers. The number of casual visitors to the site is around 20,000 per day on average.

The thing that pleases us most though is the quality of the comments that we received on the site via our comments section under each article. These comments help to police us and add a semblance of balance and normality to what is a small market sector which is unfashionable at the moment but we believe has a lot further to go!

Please feel free to join in if you have not already done so, we want to hear your voice whether you agree with us or not, your comments are really appreciated by the team here.

It is also encouraging to see that when we search msn for uranium stocks we come up top of the first page, again this is all due to our readership so once again many thanks indeed for your co-operation, patience and support.

Have a sparkling day.

Newsletter Deliveries:

Just a quick note from Dan The Man of Dansway Communications Limited, our website expert regarding administration: If your mail box is too small or full, our newsletter system powered by Feedburner may not be able to deliver your free newsletter. Feedburner will try to deliver five times and if unsuccessful your subscription is automatically suspended and no further deliveries will be made. The assumption being that your account is no longer active.

If your newsletters stop arriving then please send us an email and we will reactivate your account from this end.

This message is in response to the inquiries that we have received regarding the suspension of some of our readers accounts.

Many thanks for your patience in this matter.


Pennant on Uranium Participation (U.TO)

Uranium Participation, U.TO, appears to be forming a pennant therefore a breakout is due soon.

Pennant on Uranium Participation (U.TO)

However there is a fair amount of bearish technical pressure on U, making a upwards breakout unlikely.

Most notably the moving averages for U.TO are heading south, and the stock is still in a downtrend. This makes it difficult for the stock to mount any sizable rally, even if it did spike up out of the pennant formation, since the 200dma and (to a lesser extent) the 50dma are acting as resistance lines.

Also the MACD, RSI and STO are pretty much neutral in the middle of their ranges. If we were seeing oversold technical indicators, or a few bullish crossovers, then perhaps we could make an argument for the break up and out, but this is not the case. Therefore it is likely that U.TO will break down through the pennant and fall to $5.50.

It was also disappointing to see that U.TO only managed a feeble, short lived rally whilst the mainstream markets have been soaring this last month, again adding weight to the bearish argument in the short term.

The silver lining in this is that if you wanted to add to your position in this uranium stock then it might be at a discount in a few weeks.

If you are new to this web site and wish to receive our free newsletter regarding investment in uranium stocks and updates regarding uranium, then please click here to subscribe.

For our latest commentary and trading signals on gold and silver, click here to subscribe to The FREE Gold Prices Newsletter and click here for The FREE Silver Prices Newsletter.

Uranium Stocks A Dead Cat Bounce?

Uranium Chart u3o8 07 apr 09
Chart courtesy of

When we scan the horizon in this tiny sector we can see that a number of uranium stocks have improved dramatically since their low point at the close of 2008 in what could be a dead cat bounce. Is this the beginning of a recovery, well we certainly hope so, however, we must keep these recent improvements in context. The fact of the matter is that they have been decimated with some stocks down as much 97% so an improvement since Christmas of two to three hundred percent is nothing to celebrate but it is step in the right direction. If you are a new comer to this market sector then these gains are the stuff of your wildest dreams however if you have been involved for sometime the road to recovery is a long one.

Apart from one or two mentions this sector is attracting very little in terms of air play as the mainstream continues to wrestle with the results and ramifications of G20, IMF gold sales, bailouts for the banks and just where can we hide those toxic non-performing assets? In the meantime the spot price for uranium drifts in a southerly direction and is currently trading at $42/lb as depicted by the above chart according to both TradeTech and UxC.

The longer term uranium price remains steady at $70/lb which is depicted by the chart below kindly provided by TradeTech

TradeTech chart long term uranium price 07 apr 09

Over at NYMEX the futures prices for uranium range from $42/lb for June 2009 to $52/lb for December 2009 delivery.

Apart from the occasional pop northwards by a stock, such as Denison putting on a 26.29% gain yesterday, the order of the day appears to be a fairly static one. The broader markets have put in a terrific spurt over last four weeks and may now take a breather, if they do sell off we suspect that it will put a damper on this sectors progress as the financial turmoil tends to cloud the real issue of just where we are going to get the power from in the not too distant future.

Have a good one.

If you are new to this web site and wish to receive our free newsletter regarding investment in uranium stocks and updates regarding uranium, then please click here to subscribe.

For our latest commentary and trading signals on gold and silver, click here to subscribe to The FREE Gold Prices Newsletter and click here for The FREE Silver Prices Newsletter.

Michael Hall: Natural Gas - A Victim of Its Own Success

In the mail bag this morning we have this article about Natural Gas sent to us by The Energy Report which we hope that you find both interesting and informative:

Where's the price of oil and gas going? The volatility in the today's market is unprecedented for commodities, which Michael Hall, lead publishing analyst at Stifel Nicolaus Research Team, believes will elicit a big spike in price. In this exclusive interview with the Energy Report, Michael sifts through theories and trends in the hyper-cyclical oil and gas business and discusses future implications of declining rig counts and what that means to domestic energy.

The Energy Report: What’s your view on the oil and gas price near term and intermediate term? Something that really got our attention recently was T. Boone Pickens saying that he thought we’d see $60 or $80 oil before we’d see $40 again. We were darn close to $40 at the time.

Michael Hall: Near term, it’s extremely hard to say whether we’ll see $75, which is what I think T. Boone threw out there, or $40 first. The volatility in the market today is unprecedented for a number of asset classes, and commodities are no exception. I think we’re setting up for a big spike, a big run up in price. I’m not sure it happens overnight, though.

Our view is to continue to try and stay somewhat cautious throughout 2009. On the supply side, U.S. producers are laying off rigs by the dozen every week. The supply side of things is going to fix itself. Unfortunately, I think we’re going to really have to wait to see a turnaround in demand until we see a good sustained snap back in price. Then the big question for us becomes when, obviously, and that’s a tough one. I don’t think it’s overnight.

TER: Michael, you say ‘the supply side is going to fix itself,’ which sounds to me like we currently have too much inventory. We’re shutting down rigs and production, and eventually we’re going to hit that crossover in demand. Do you have any projection on when that supply is going to finally meet demand?

MH: Yes. It’s a good question. I spend most of my time with the natural gas markets, and we’ve done a lot of work trying to assess when all these rig count reductions will make their way into the market. Some of the work we’ve done suggests that we’re probably already starting to see—though we don’t get real-time data—some production decline as a result of rigs being laid down.

To give you a little background info, the rig count, which is provided on a weekly basis by a firm called Baker Hughes Inc. (NYSE:BHI), peaked out in September 2008 with the gas rig count at 1,606 rigs. As of the end of last week, it had fallen 640 rigs, give or take, so you’ve seen a pretty massive decline, 40% decline, from the peak. We think that’s already starting to have an impact on supply.

As far as demand, I’ve got some indications on some leading indicators that it’s starting to at least slow the rate of decline, which is encouraging, but not quite a turnaround yet. When it all crosses is a really difficult thing to determine, but I certainly don’t think it’s this first half of '09. We tend to think maybe we’ll see the snap back in the fourth quarter of 2009 for the gas market, keeping in mind all summer, every summer, we’re always injecting gas into storage and all winter we’re always pulling gas out of storage. It’s really once we hit the winter this year, this next winter, I think that’s when you could a sustained rally.

TER: So it's hard to tell. If we have a big mild winter, then we could still be in an oversupply situation.

MH: Next year? Yes, it’s certainly possible. The way we see inventories shaking out by the end of the summer, call it November 2009, is right around 3.7 trillion cubic feet of gas in storage at that time, which would be well above five-year average and pushing up against full. (Full is thought to be around 4 trillion cubic feet of gas.) If we come into the winter with that sort of storage environment and it’s a warm winter, yes, you might not get the big run up. That said, our math suggests supply will be on a steep decline by that point, which could help to aggravate any weather impacts.

TER: But if we’re pretty much at almost full, to me it’s sort of like the water levels in California. You have to have a fair amount of consumption to get it down to what would be a point where the massive run up of natural gas would occur.

MH: Yes, agreed. I think what’s important to keep in mind, though, is if underlying that storage is a supply and demand environment where supply is shrinking rapidly, which is what we think could be happening by, call it November 2009—and by rapidly, I mean declining around 9% year on year, which is a pretty steep decline—and if, all of a sudden, your supply and demand balance is that far out of balance, even if it’s somewhat warm, you’re going to draw down from storage very quickly. It may not happen in November, in terms of the price run up, but I think it’s still probably likely at some point during winter of 2010, assuming demand is coming back, from a macro standpoint, by that point.

TER: How quickly can these rigs come back on line?

MH: That’s a good question and hard to assess precisely, but there are some issues in the system in terms of logistically getting rigs back up and running. So it’s not overnight. I tend to think you can probably drop rigs faster than you can bring them back on. So, historically, if you look at rig counts, they tend to fall off really hard when things get oversupplied, and then they take a lot longer to add back to the recount. So it’s more of a slow, gradual build up. The reason being you’ve got to go hire all the crews that were laid off; you’ve got to find the people; you’ve got to mobilize the rigs to where you want them.

Then what I think could be an issue this cycle is capital. All these companies have pretty much gone into hunker-down mode, where they’re spending within their cash flow and acting very conservatively, as they should be. But, if all of a sudden you get a snap back in price and let’s say they want to go spend 150% of cash flow to answer that snap back, we may be still in an environment where capital is still quite risk averse, and that could just be another kink in the system in terms of getting rigs back up and running quickly.

TER: What non-geopolitical situation could possibly cause oil to go up in price? Obviously, if we have a geopolitical situation, that could have a big impact on the price of oil.

MH: Two things really. It’s supply and demand, right? And on the supply side, it’s continued cuts from OPEC and/or greater adherence by OPEC to their existing cuts. There was a bit of a consensus in the market that we’d see more cuts out of OPEC in March. We were not convinced that that would happen, and indeed it didn’t. But if you see another cut out of OPEC this year, you could get a bit of a snap back or a rally. But the sustainability of that rally, I think, is underpinned by demand. Until we see an improved demand environment—and by that, just global GDP resuming its upward trend—until you get that, I really think it’s going to be pretty difficult to have a sustained increase in price. It needs to be both supply and demand.

TER: So then, you’re saying the recession needs to be resolved and bottomed, and then it will start to build.

MH: I believe so, yes. At the end of the day, I’ve always kind of thought that for crude markets, and really most commodity markets, marginal demand is what sets the price. As long as demand is falling, in theory, marginal demand is a lower price than the current price. Until we get the snap back in demand—and I don’t think it has to be dramatic to firm things or at least get things moving up on a sustainable basis—but until you get that return of demand, I think it’s going to be pretty tough to maintain an upward slope in crude prices.

I think we could still have a decline in demand worldwide in 2009; but by 2010, I think it’ll be back. Long term, I certainly see a very robust environment for crude demand growth.

A stat I like to throw out: if you look at the average consumption per capita in China and India and average those two countries, it currently runs around 8% of the average per-capita consumption in South Korea and Japan. If you increase that to just 30% of the South Korean and Japanese average by 2020, that increase alone from China and India is enough to provide 2% annual growth in global demand through 2020 in the crude markets, holding everyone else flat. There’s just an immense amount of potential in those markets. But if everyone else is failing from a GDP standpoint, I don’t think emerging markets have much hope. I think the myth of uncorrelated global growth was kind of busted in the last year—after we had busted it in the past—so we learned our lesson again. It’s there and the BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India, and China) are huge. They’re very important, but I don’t think they’re going to be able to do it if we’re still struggling in the U.S.

TER: When I think of low gasoline prices, that’s like a tax give-back to consumers, which they’re enjoying. How do you measure the offset of that to a higher oil price and how many benefits do you get for that vs. the lower one where individuals have a little more money to spend? Is there a correlation there?

MH: There has been work done on that. You can almost think of it as a stimulus package of its own into the economy. Some teams in our Research Department have done the math on that. It’s an extremely significant stimulus on the economy.

And there are actually signs that people are driving again. If you look at vehicle miles traveled in the U.S., they had been on decline starting last year on a year-on-year basis—the first decline we’d seen since I believe the ‘80s, but perhaps the early ‘90s. Those are starting to turn back over, and the trend is starting to look a little more friendly on that stat. So there’s evidence that people are taking note of cheap gasoline right now.

TER: Sure, especially those who do it for a living and do the cost comparison.

MH: That’s a good pitch for natural gas. High oil prices, assuming they come back, will result, I think, eventually in higher gasoline prices. But there’s a big call, a big lobby anyhow, trying to push for additional use of natural gas as a vehicle fuel. Long term, I think it’s an interesting market from a demand standpoint for natural gas. I don’t think it fixes or snaps anything in the near term, but it’s something to watch.

TER: What are some companies that you’re currently giving a buy rating to that would obviously benefit from that?

MH: Well, they’d all probably benefit ultimately. One that’s been active in pushing and lobbying for natural gas being used as a vehicle fuel—for domestic security and clean air reasons and just energy diversity—is Chesapeake Energy (NYSE:CHK). I’ve got a buy rating on that and that’s one that, like many in the oil and gas patch, has seen a dramatic decline from its highs of last summer. It’s currently trading just under $20 a share after peaking out over $60 a share last June-July timeframe.

They’ve got the largest inventory of leasehold in the country and I think provide more optionality to gas, probably, than any other stock out there—particularly on a large cap front. At this point, you’re getting a lot of that optionality for free. I think the market’s trying to test what you would call a ‘proved value,’ so just what their proved reserves are worth in the ground. And, you know, you could end up lingering here until we get that snap back in price. But if you can have any sort of long view, I think you have dramatic potential upside with Chesapeake shares at this point.

TER: What’s your price target?

MH: Our targets are based on a number of different price scenarios and just to give the base case of what we assume is $7 gas and $70 oil by 2012 and beyond. Between now and then, we start with $4.60 in 2009 and then ramp it up to $7.50. We also run a number of different cases. But our current target on it is $27, which provides meaningful upside and, like I said, is well below the 52-week high of well over $60.

TER: Can you give our readers some of the ideas and ways you think they can position themselves in your sector with stocks that you like?

MH: Sure. Chesapeake’s one I’ve always liked a lot. Unfortunately, I’ve ridden it all the way up and down, but I do see a lot of potential, particularly long-term, with Chesapeake. Another on the large-cap side is XTO Energy Inc. (NYSE:XTO). XTO is what we call the highest quality of all the large cap gas names that we look at. They’ve done a tremendous job of hedging over the last year. They ended up monetizing over $2 billion in hedge gains over the last couple of months, paying down debt, and fixing up a balance sheet that had some leveraging on it after roughly $11 billion in acquisitions during 2008. The push back is, let’s say, people say they bought at the top. My rebuttal and theirs would be, well, they hedged very well and they locked in their returns when they did those acquisitions. What it really did was just recharge the inventory position at the company. They think they have a good solid five-year inventory to continue growing the company at a peer-busting clip. I think probably over 15% a year in terms of production growth on their current inventory. So in theory you could have significant appreciated growth over the next five years. Our target on XTO is $39. Both of these companies are extremely well hedged looking out this year and next.

TER: What about a smaller cap company?

MH: One down the cap structure that I have been highlighting a lot is Petrohawk Energy Corp. (NYSE:HK). This is more of a mid-cap producer that’s had extreme volatility in last 12 months and the big reason being is that they, along with Chesapeake, really, helped expose what’s now thought of as one of the industry’s leading shale plays, which is the Haynesville Shale. The Haynesville Shale is in Northern Louisiana and East Texas, although the Northern Louisiana part is kind of leading the economics at this point. Petrohawk’s put up, frankly, the best wells, as their legacy acreage happened to be right smack in the heart of this Haynesville Shale in their Elm Grove field. So they’ve put up wells that have initial production rates in excess of 20 million cubic feet a day.

These wells come off hard, come off fast, 80% in the first year or more, so you’re setting up a steep treadmill as soon as you stop drilling because it’s going to be hard to get back on for all these companies, and for the industry as a whole, with all these shale plays. But I think Petrohawk, for a mid cap, has one of the brightest outlooks out there. They did just do a follow-on stock offering to help shore up the balance sheet for some acquisition opportunities they see in the core of the Haynesville Shale, and then they also did a significant amount of high yield back earlier this year in the January timeframe. So they’re well capitalized at this point and they’re actually still planning to grow their production 40% in 2009 despite the current environment. My most recent target is $25 per share.

The 52-week high on it is well over $40, so you’re well within that range and still have meaningful upside potential from here. Frankly, long term, and while I have no knowledge of any M&A activity, I believe it could be a take out. I think eventually it’ll get acquired just given the quality of the asset they have in the Haynesville. It’ll probably end up in the hands of a larger company with greater capitalization.

A small cap favorite I’ve been pushing is Bill Barrett Corp. (NYSE:BBG). Bill Barrett’s predecessor company, Barrett Resources, was the Rockies gas explorer that was sold to Williams several years ago and Bill Barrett Corp. is the follow-on company. Fred Barrett is the CEO, the son of Bill Barrett. Bill Barrett’s still on the board. The company remains an active explorer and developer in the Rockies region. Historically, the Rockies have kind of been thought of as a long supply/short demand environment, so you end up with export constraints and issues getting the gas to market. So, you’ve had big price discounts on Rockies gas for the last few years. You had a big pipeline come around in 2008, the Rockies Express pipeline, which opened up a lot of opportunities for Rockies producers. Again, in 2008, we’ve already almost filled it up. But here we are, as everyone is laying off rigs, the Rockies has laid off rigs at a faster clip.

There are indications that Rockies production as a whole, industry-wide, is actually starting to decline. I think that could help the pricing issue, particularly from a relative standpoint. The company currently trades at almost $24 a share. I’ve got a $36 target on it. It trades at significant discounts to everyone I cover. It’s at 2.9 times cash flow, 3.7 times EV/EBITDA. You’re paying just $1.48 for proved reserves in the ground. My peer averages on all those are 4.9 times cash flow, 6.1 times EV/EBITDA, and $2.14 for proved reserved.

It’s a small company; it’s somewhat under-loved, under-appreciated in my opinion. I think as prices eventually recover, the Rockies could well lead that recovery because of this additional capacity that was brought on line in 2008 that we’ll have to fill back up again. They’ve done a good job of delivering with the drill bit on the exploration front. In 2008, they discovered a play called the Gothic Shale. It’s in the Paradox Basin in Colorado and it’s a shale gas play like any of the others. It’s just in the Rockies and it looks like they’ve got a significant multi-year development project on their hands that they’ll be continuing to prove up in 2009.

TER: Are they going to need funding? How do they get their capital?

MH: They are currently drilling and spending within cash flow, which is the mantra of the industry at this point. Historically, they’ve been conservative with the balance sheet, and they tend to keep things that way. They’ve done a really good job of hedging as well, so they’ve locked in their significant cash flows for this year and next. I don’t show them in an immediate need of any funds. And, if things get back off to the races, then if they want to try to accelerate development in this Gothic Shale or some other play, it’s an option out there.

TER: What about in the limited partnerships?

MH: The one I would probably choose to highlight would be Atlas Energy Resources (NYSE:ATN). A big part of what they do is offer what are called ‘drilling program partnerships’ to the public. So you can be a general partner in their drilling program and they’ll flow through tax write offs, basically, so you can shelter a lot of income.

The new budget being proposed by the Obama administration is proposing a repeal of what are called ‘intangible drilling costs’ and the expensing of intangible drilling costs (IDCs). That could affect that part of their business. I don’t know if it would eliminate it. From my talks with the company and after thinking things through, I think there are some opportunities to restructure how the partnerships would be offered. There still would be some deductions it seems like from the IDC standpoint. It just wouldn’t be overnight; you wouldn’t get to expense it all up front. But, that said, even if that part of the business goes, there still is a stream of cash flow that would basically deplete over time like a well that is still flowing to Atlas. If I just take what I’d call a normalized cash flow assumption for 2009 and back off the part that’s at risk because of the proposals in the new budget, I still get a $2.68 per unit normalized cash flow. If I slap a five times multiple on that, which is a pretty normalized mid-cycle multiple for an E&P company, you still get about $13.40 per unit.

I’ve got a $34 target out there on the company. I think there’s a significant opportunity here, frankly. You’ve got around a 20% yield. But even taking the much more conservative approach as just a walk-through with that somewhat normalized cash flow, you still get over $13 per unit in potential here. I think it’s a very interesting entry point, as I think the market’s somewhat overreacted to some proposed legislation. There’s still headline risk out there, maybe you wait to see what actually ends up happening with the budget. But I believe for those that can take a bit of a longer view, it could be a big opportunity.

TER: You say if they lose this part of the business, they still have almost a royalty, in a sense, operation. What would be the value? Let’s say that business totally goes away, now we’re left with what we have. Is your $52 target still intact?

MH: That’s where the other interesting part of the story lies—they’re sitting on over 240,000 net acres in the heart of what’s called the Marcellus Shale. The Marcellus Shale is in Pennsylvania, all throughout, really, New York, West Virginia, thought to be potentially the largest gas find in the world at this point. They’ve got a big core position right in the heart of what’s going on in southwest Pennsylvania.

At this point, I don’t think you’re paying anything for that in the stock and that’s where the majority of what’s called the ‘upside’ in my target price comes from; over time, I think they’re going to prove this asset up. They’ve already drilled several wells, proven it up. They’re one of the leading producers out of the Marcellus Shale and they’re kicking off a horizontal drilling campaign in 2009 that’s going to, I think, prove this asset to be worth multiple billion dollars to unit holders. So it’s almost, I call it, a special situation because I think you probably end up having a restructuring of the company. It’s currently an LLC; they pay out a significant distribution, currently 61 cents a quarter. I see that distribution as safe so long as they continue to have the structure they're in. But, again, if you think about the asset they’re holding in the Marcellus, it’s basically a growth asset, or it should be; so I believe you ought to be plowing 100%-plus of the cash flow that that asset generates back into the asset to continue growing it.

If you’re paying out significant distributions, you can’t grow that asset as quickly as you should, in theory. So from my talks with them and from my own personal view, I think a restructuring of the company is possible and some sort of carve-out or another sale of the asset. It’ll be complicated if it happens, but I think ultimately a lot of value will be unlocked here and I think it’s an extremely compelling opportunity.

TER: Is this an industry wherein the price of gas falls victim to what the storage is at any given point? Now we’re taking rigs off, so the storage is eventually going to go down. Gas will go up; but once it goes up, you fill up the storage. So is it always this never-ending fluctuation?

MH: It’s a hyper-cyclical business and it’s extremely volatile. It’s very seasonal on top of very cyclical. Natural gas, stepping way back from a macro perspective, it’s really a heating fuel in the winter, and it’s a power-generating or cooling (air conditioning) fuel in the summer. You add not only cyclical pressures from industrial demand, but then also seasonality to it. Yes, it’s very, very volatile; it’s very, very seasonal and those who are faint of heart should be wary.

It’s a risky sector; it’s very, very volatile, but there’s more to it than just storage. There are some long-term secular themes that are important. The industry is kind of a victim of its own success. When storage runs out, it’ll do its best to fill it back up—but it kills its own cycle every time. That’s what’s happened over the last five to seven years. The industry had been thought of by consumer, and maybe by regulatory, groups as an industry that couldn’t grow. What’s really been proven over the last few years is that it can grow if it gets the right pricing to do it. The resource is out there.

From a long-term perspective, from a consumer standpoint, you don’t want to rely on an industry that can’t grow, right? But if it can grow, then it’s a much more viable fuel for power generation, and possibly transportation, and it becomes that much more interesting from a regulatory, as well as a consumer standpoint. It’s a changing industry; it’s an interesting industry in that sense, but I think it’s highly investable still because of what’s being exposed this year.

TER: How long are these business cycles? You say it’s hyper-cyclical. You mentioned we’ve been building up for seven years and this is a seven to ten-year cycle. Can it really change within two years?

MH: That’s a good question. By the cyclical side of things, I mean the broad economy. Industrial demand is 18 billion cubic feet a day of demand on 64 billion cubic feet a day. So it’s nearly a third of total demand. So if industry is shrinking, you’re going to have demand headwinds, and that’s more what I mean on the cyclical side of things. So that’s more dependent on how long it’s going to take the U.S. and world economies to start back up again. In terms of a six, seven, or ten-year cycle–it’s hard to say. I think it’s different every cycle.

From a macro perspective, you’ve got a lot of ultimately inflationary actions coming out of the government, and it could take some time for the multiplier to kick back into effect and dollars start changing hands again. But, when they do, I think a lot of these commodities plays will have real businesses, will throw off real cash flows and are worth a lot more than what they’re trading for today. If you can take a longer view on things, it’s a sector that’s worthy of looking at, I think, but it's also high risk. I would emphasize that.

TER: Michael, thanks so much for your time.

Michael A. Hall, CFA, joined the Stifel Nicolaus Research Team in August 2007. He has been covering the energy sector for roughly six years. Most recently, Michael worked as a Senior Associate covering domestic Exploration & Production at Wachovia Capital Markets. Prior to that, Mr. Hall was a lead associate on the same team at Jefferies & Company and initially at First Albany Capital. He previously worked at Stifel Nicolaus from 2003–2004 and started his coverage of the Energy sector following the Oilfield Services industry. Mr. Hall's return to Stifel Nicolaus marks his initial effort as a lead publishing analyst and he intends to continue to focus his coverage on the domestic Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry.

Want to read more exclusive Energy Report interviews like this? Sign up for our free e-newsletter, and you'll learn when new articles have been published. To see a list of recent interviews with industry analysts and commentators, visit our Expert Insights page.

Disclosure: Additional disclosures are available upon request. View here. Additional disclosures include our risks to target prices, which are:

Chesapeake Energy (CHK): In our view, there are a number of risks to our target price on CHK shares. Those risks include, but are not limited to, the failure of management to adhere to its financial plan, the inability to bring F&D costs more in line with industry peers, the failure of emerging resource plays to materialize or at least the potential of those plays to emerge as much less economic than the company's current set of projects, the inability to lock up leases through production, and a sustained downturn in commodity prices in general.

XTO Energy (XTO): In our view, there are a number of risks to our target price on XTO shares. Those risks include, but are not limited to, the failure of management to integrate recent acquisitions, the inability to execute on substantial growth plans, the failure of emerging resource plays to materialize or at least the potential of those plays to emerge as much less economic than the company's current set of projects, and a sustained downturn in commodity prices in general.

Petrohawk Energy (HK): In our view, there are a number of risks to our target price on shares of Petrohawk Energy. Those risks include, but are not limited to, an overly aggressive assessment of resource potential in the company's various plays - particularly the Haynesville Shale, a blowout of the basis differential at the Henry/Perryville/Carthage Hub, a dramatic tightening in the supply of rigs, completion services, and pipeline capacity, as well as a sustained downturn in commodity prices in general.

Bill Barrett Corp. (BBG): In our view, there are a number of risks to our target price on shares of Bill Barrett Corp. Those risks include, but are not limited to: a sustained downturn in commodity prices in general, expansion of the discount of Rockies gas prices to NYMEX due to a tightening of pipeline takeaway capacity (specifically as it pertains to capacity on the Rockies Express pipeline), a negative record of decision from the BLM on the West Tavaputs EIS, as well as a failure of the market to recognize the company's vast resource potential and to price shares as such.

Atlas Energy Resources (ATN): In our view, there are a number of risks to our target price and distribution estimates for Atlas Energy Resources. Those risks include, but are not limited to, a rising corporate decline curve, the suitability of the prospective Marcellus Shale for the MLP structure, and a tightening of the service market in the Appalachian Basin. In addition, given the importance of the tax treatment on MLPs to their consideration as an investment opportunity, any negative changes in tax treatment could likely result in significant underperformance in ATN units.

The Energy Report - - a unique, free site, featuring summaries of articles from major publications, specific recommendations from newsletter writers, analysts and portfolio managers covering the fossil, nuclear ,renewable, and alternative energy sectors. To subscribe, please complete our online form (

The Energy Report is Copyright © 2009 by Streetwise Inc. All rights are reserved. Streetwise Inc. hereby grants an unrestricted license to use or disseminate this copyrighted material only in whole (and always including this disclaimer), but never in part. The Energy Report does not render investment advice and does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services or securities of any company mentioned in this report. From time to time, Streetwise Inc. directors, officers, employees or members of their families may have a long or short position in securities mentioned and may make purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise. Streetwise Inc. does not guarantee the accuracy or thoroughness of the information reported.

Got a comment, then fire it in.

Stay tuned folks..

If you are new to investment in the precious metals sector then you may wish to subscribe of our FREE newsletters regarding gold stocks, silver stocks and uranium stocks, just click on the links.