Subscribe for 12 months with recurring billing - $199

Buy 12 months of subscription time - $199


Search Uranium Stocks
Uranium Price
Our RSS Feed

Uranium Updates

Enter your email address:

Follow Us on Twitter
« Uranium ticks up! | Main | Incentives for a Boom in the construction of nuclear reactors! »

Australian Uranium Policy: A Queenslanders view!

Map of Queensland 15oct07

Before any investment is entered into we should assess the political environment in terms of its acceptability to what is proposed. As Australia is home to the largest reserves of uranium then the Australian political scene is of immense interest to us.

One of our readers has sent us his view, which makes interesting reading below:

Anyone with an interest in Australian uranium properties is probably also curious about local attitudes toward exploration and exporting. The current liberal government has a forward thinking approach to nuclear energy already signing agreements with China, Japan, India and most recently Russia, however Australia is at an important cross road in federal politics. With an election announced on November 24th and the opposition labor party currently streets ahead in polls, it may be an important time to look closely at their uranium position.

As you probably know, for 25 years labor has maintained its “three mines” policy restricting uranium mining to existing projects. In April this year labor, led by Kevin Rudd voted 205 to 190 to abandon the old policy. This seems positive but there’s a catch. Currently the decision to mine uranium is left up to individual states and although most states oblige and profit, there are important exceptions.

Alan Carpenter, the labor Premier of Western Australia is steadfast in blocking uranium mining. His position is becoming increasingly uncomfortable as the federal government explores options to alter his perception. It is likely that a change in federal power and a labor prime minister may prove more persuasive. Queensland’s premier Beattie was also against anything uranium but has recently softened his stance. During his state party conference in July 2007, premier Beattie changed his rhetoric from blocking uranium mining to assuring local members that uranium enrichment is not on the agenda, a significant back flip.

The plot thickened when Premier Beattie announced his imminent retirement after nine years in power. He named Annah Bligh as his successor and begs the obvious question, “Who is Annah Bligh?”

Anna Bligh 15oct07

Annah comes from a strong labor left background. She has been groomed for the leadership role over the last two years with key portfolios in finance and business related areas. Her views on uranium have reflected her outgoing premier to date. On the 18th of May 2006 she addressed the Queensland Media Club seeking clean energy alternatives for her party stating, “Companies that want to explore for and mine uranium must work with scientists to lobby politicians and the public. Convincing them that the safety concerns that existed two decades ago, that we are somehow now in a position to resolve them.” By August 2006 her words had softened when Annah told the Courier Mail in Brisbane she was “Keeping an open mind towards uranium and labour’s no new mines policy” (22/08/2006). By March 2007 the government had received a report indicating that uranium mining would not adversely impact Queensland’s huge coal industry. The three mines policy was dropped in late April with both Beattie and Annah Bligh’s blessing.

Since April this year, the now Premier Bligh has sent mixed messages. She firstly reiterated her opposition to establishing a nuclear power industry in Queensland stating she would strictly limit its involvement to extracting uranium for export overseas. This sounds positive but in contrast on September 14th 2007 Annah Bligh gave an “unequivocal” commitment to the ban on uranium mining through a spokesperson, (source It will be interesting to finally get a statement straight from the horse’s mouth.

When it comes down to it, Australia has a federal government that is aggressively pro uranium. They are currently pursuing uranium supply agreements internationally. States such as South Australia are supportive. The federal government controls mining approvals in the Northern Territory and the Tasmanian government has just made uranium mining legal. This leaves Queensland and Western Australia in lone opposition. Federal power is likely to change late 2007 and will be headed Kevin Rudd, a strong uranium advocate. He will probably have more influence on all eight state leaders who are from within his own party.

It seems that most leaders including Australia’s now understand that when it comes to nuclear energy it is not a question of ‘if’ but ‘when’. The people are slower to catch on and I sometimes wonder if the end game has already been decided for us. While the politicians talk tough on uranium mining in Queensland and Western Australia, state governments continue approving exploration licenses. This makes no sense unless future plans include a political change of heart. It may be strategic for some states to feign opposition to uranium and wait for an evil higher power in ‘the federal government’ to forcefully intervene. Watch this space!!!!

Paul Trevethan (Queenslander!)

If you would like to send us a ‘Johnny on the spot’ review of an area near you regarding any aspect of uranium mining we will do our best to publish it. By pooling our knowledge we will all be better informed and hopefully make better investment decisions going forward.

Should you wish to receive our free newsletter then please click on this LINK.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (1)

Well written and balanced PT.
I am in Perth and for a year have tended to avoid u co's with assets in WA or Qld. If Australian voters put the ALP in it will be the first time in our history (I think) that they will have returned the ALP Federally while ALP Govts are wall to wall in every State. It would certainly be a hugely historic time in Australian policy making and being in my 60's I doubt I would see the damage repaired in my lifetime. I doubt that Kevin Rudd could maintain his uranium stance in the face of ALP left / Green pressure. I would expect a new ALP administration to be the focus of colossal policy horse trading between labor factions and would not be surprised if the narrow pro u mining ALP Conference vote from April was somehow trampled in the dust. Can just see Rudd now saying in effect, he is just leaving the decision to each State. It is far from a core issue for him.
On another subject, did I just see the TradeTech spot price nudge up from 75 to 78 ?

October 15, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterWarwick Hughes

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>