Greenpeace Can Stop Nuclear Power In One Move
Print This Post
|
Email This Page:
Topic: Other — July 20th, 2007
Greenpeace are in our humble opinion, mindlessly opposing and campaigning against nuclear power, the only reason for this that we can see is that Greenpeace just want something to protest about, as after all, that’s what they do.
However we have a way that Greenpeace and anti-nuclear campaigns can stop the expansion of nuclear energy right now.
The main reason for building more nuclear power plants is that we need to meet the world’s surging energy needs. So if one looks at this logically, if we were to curb energy demand, we would also curb the demand for nuclear power.
Therefore if all die hard Greenpeace campaigners and other “environmentalists” would be so kind as to turn off all their lights and generally stop using electricity altogether, we can stop supporting nuclear power as there will no longer be the need.
In fact, this probably will not be enough. Nuclear energy provides about 20% of the UK’s electricity and a similar amount in the United States. We doubt that 1 in 5 people are so anti nuclear that they would turn off all the lights. Therefore it will be not be enough and so anti nuclear campaigners will have to not only stop using energy but actually contribute to the energy supply, as they are the minority and others should not suffer because of their beliefs. Perhaps we could construct human sized hamster wheels for these people to run around on in order to make up for the short fall in power….
Is this a joke? Yes – but so is the policy of Greenpeace.
Nathan Argent, nuclear campaigner for Greenpeace, recently called nuclear power, “this out-of-date, expensive and dangerous technology”.
Nuclear power certainly carries dangers, but statistically it is safer than oil, coal, gas and many other energy sources. Nuclear power is expensive but energy is expensive, so if you want energy you have to pay to price. However to say that nuclear power is out of date is simply a lie. Nuclear technology is state of the art, one of the pinnacles of scientific success. It has only been around for about 50-60 years, windmills have been going for thousands of year, so how in any way is nuclear technology dated?
Greenpeace Questions On Nuclear Power Answered
UK Government Gives Go Ahead for 4 New Nuclear Reactors
The Nuclear Tide is Turning: Now Israel Plans To Develop Nuclear Power
Wind and Solar power: Fantasy
Threats to the Uranium Bull Market
|
|
If you read Greenpeace propaganda, you will see that they are the original watermellons: green on the outside, red on the inside. Red China forsook communism,as it is unworkable, and embraced fascism — a totalitairan system that unfotunately can keep a nation going because it still allows profits to business and manufacturing enterprises. However fascism is coupled with strong militarism, as was the case in Hitler’s Germany.
Thus, China is much more a menace to our lives and freedoms than it was under Mao. Greenpeace and nearly all other green outfits are fascistic organizations, run by leaders who hate freedom for everyone except themselves. They do their utmost to block all viable supplies of energy to the free nations, while pushing energy supplies in the same free nations that, with small and insignificant exceptions are worse than useless. If we fail to them, the free nations will become weaker (as is already happening) while the fascist nations, such as China, Cuba, Venezuella, and now Russia, are becoming stronger and totalitarians will rule the world.
Let us call the greens what they are: enviro fascists, or better yet, enviro nazis.
It is High Noon for the U.S. and for freedom. We shall either stop these enemies or be destroyed.
Comment by Mike Oliver — July 21, 2007 @ 3:31 pm
If you read Greenpeace propaganda, you will see that they are the original watermellons: green on the outside, red on the inside. Red China forsook communism,as it is unworkable, and embraced fascism — a totalitairan system that unfotunately can keep a nation going because it still allows profits to business and manufacturing enterprises. However fascism is coupled with strong militarism, as was the case in Hitler’s Germany.
Thus, China is much more a menace to our lives and freedoms than it was under Mao. Greenpeace and nearly all other green outfits are fascistic organizations, run by leaders who hate freedom for everyone except themselves. They do their utmost to block all viable supplies of energy to the free nations, while pushing energy supplies in the same free nations that, with small and insignificant exceptions are worse than useless. If we fail to stop them, the free nations will become weaker (as is already happening) while the fascist nations, such as China, Cuba, Venezuella, and now Russia, are becoming stronger and totalitarians will rule the world.
Let us call the greens for what they are: enviro fascists, or better yet, enviro nazis.
It is High Noon for the U.S. and for freedom. We shall either stop these enemies or be destroyed.
___________________________________________________________
We placed this comment earlear today, but in our haste to have it posted failed to note that we left out two importat words: In the previous version, there is a sentence that reads “If we fail them”… etc. It shoudld read “If we fail to stop them.”. etc..
Comment by Mike Oliver — July 21, 2007 @ 6:49 pm
Great discussion! I thought you might be interested in recent International Nuclear News:
Japanese nuclear power plant remarkably resistant to earthquake
Tepco’s detailed report on the effects of the Niigawa earthquake on its Kaskiwazaki Kariwa nuclear power plant show just how resistant the reactor was to the effects of the earthquake. There was no damage to the reactors themselves or the turbine building structures. What damage there was happened primarily to the ancillory buildings. Ultimately, the two small leaks that occurred had no environmnental impact and were within allowed limits.
click here for more
Investors Line Up For Buglarian Reactor Project
Bulgaria’s project to build two new reactors at Belene has got the interest of some major European companies. Electrable, CEZ, EOn, RWE, ATEL, EGL, EdF, Endesa and Kumerio Med have all been short-listed to take various minority stakes in the construction and management of the project.
Construction is due to begin next year, with the reactors coming online in about eight year’s time.
click here for more information
Comment by Professor Matt — July 23, 2007 @ 3:01 pm
I don’t know if your letter is set up to show a cartoon. But if it was how about one showing three greenpeacers, complete with long hair, tattoos and large peace symbol necklaces, a couple and another female. The female who is part of the couple says to the other female: Actually, George and I are between causes right now.
————————————————————–
Note to your editor: This would be much in the vein of your article dated July 20, 2007, titled “Greenpeace can stop nuclear power”.
Comment by william behrens — August 4, 2007 @ 10:03 pm
Bullshit. Greenpeace works diligently and they are committed to the welfare of the planet, unlike the rest of the world. Nuclear power never was and never will be the answer to our power needs. I am disillusioned by our current admistration, Obama is just laying down and not following through with his promisies for solar and wind and hydro power, the true solutions to our needs.
Comment by maria concilio — February 16, 2010 @ 2:19 pm
Maria,
Does this statement not do anything for you?
This one plant will cut carbon pollution by 16 million tons each year when compared with a similar coal plant - it won’t persuade all the environmentalists, but it is an argument that does weigh heavily with some of them - Mark Mardel
taken from our latest post.
Comment by Uranium Stocks — February 17, 2010 @ 2:11 am